Despite
recent findings by Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals suggesting that finite treatment with an RNAi medicine might be possible in the search for a (functional) cure of HBV, less
frequent dosing is always a plus.
It now seems that fresh HBV entrant Dicerna may have stumbled across a way
to reduce dosing frequency and at the same time uncovered an intriguing piece of HBV biology involving the mysterious HBV
X protein (HBx).
Search
for perfect RNAi target site uncovers important HBV biology
Gene
knockdown trigger selection has become critical in a highly competitive field
featuring not only Arrowhead and Dicerna, but also Arbutus, Ionis (along with partner
GSK), and the Alnylam-Vir alliance in the Western World alone. This is because ‘by rotten luck’, Arrowhead found that an RNAi trigger that was designed to hit all the HBV transcript did not take into account the absence of the
target site on transcripts that derive from host chromosomally integrated HBV.
The finding
that in many patients, e-antigen negative patients in particular, most viral
transcripts derive from integrated HBV, has to be considered the most important
new discovery in HBV biology and disease progression since the finding of NTCP
as the viral entry receptor.
This has
established the selection of a target site upstream of the integration breakpoint
as the new industry standard. Little did
we know that the search of the perfect RNAi target site should yield another
fundamental insight into HBV biology that could also be therapeutically valuable and provide for some important competitive differentiation for late entrant
Dicerna.
HBx-sparing
RNAi trigger has dramatic impact on HBV core protein localization
When
scanning the HBV genome for target sites, Dicerna found that an RNAi trigger
that hits all HBV transcripts except for HBx was associated with considerably
more sustained gene silencing following a single dose (>>8 weeks in a mouse
model where GalNAc-RNAi is generally less long-lived compared to humans) compared
to an RNAi trigger hitting all HBV transcripts without exception (~3 weeks
until knockdown was considerably lessened).
Further underlining
the longevity of the effect, Arbutus’ LNP-based formulation was only able to
produce 1 week of good gene silencing in the same (HDI; slide 6) mouse model.
Interestingly,
this effect was correlated with striking differences in the cellular
localization of the HBV core protein: when all gene products were equally targeted,
core protein was predominantly in the nucleus.
By contrast, core protein was almost exclusively cytoplasmic when HBx
was spared. Since phosphorylation of the
C-terminal domain is known to be important for HBx nuclear trafficking, it was
speculated that HBx may bind in that region and thus mask the nuclear
localization signal. This would be useful during the late stages of a viral infection when core protein would be needed for pregenomic RNA packaging and ultimately viral release.
The reason
why gene silencing would be shorter lived when core was in the nucleus is
likely due to its stimulating activity on transcription from the HBV cccDNA which
would increase transcript dynamics and thus more quickly dilute out the anti-HBV-loaded RNAi
machinery in the cytoplasm.
Indeed, in
a non-cccDNA-dependent mouse model (e.g. more reminiscent of e-antigen negative
patients), this beneficial effect was not observed.
In summary,
while the mechanistic basis of the differential silencing phenomenon remains to
be fully fleshed out by further experimentation, Dicerna has found a way to
quite dramatically extend gene silencing and thus decrease drug administration frequency. This is a useful competitive feature in antivirals
in general where drug resistance due to missed doses is always a concern and also simply due to patient convenience.
Disclosure: long DRNA.
why this sudden surge in $ARWR. Is there a financing coming? $ARWR management marks the worst out there.
ReplyDeleteIS $DRNA priced to perfection. More upside? What are your price targets?
ReplyDeleteI do not see you mention $ARCT. What is your impression of mRNA vs $DRNA and $ARWR. What is your price target for $ARCT?
ReplyDelete