At least,
this is what Big Pharma and Biotech is saying right now following deals between
pure-play RNAi companies Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals and Dicerna with Amgen and Eli Lilly, respectively, and the sale of The Medicines Company with its lead
PCSK9 RNAi asset really being only a matter of timing. Besides its new relationship with Eli Lilly announced yesterday, Dicerna has an ongoin CVD-related NASH/NAFLD collaboration with Boehringer-Ingelheim. In addition, Wave Life Sciences and Akcea,
the commercial Ionis spin-out, have been pursuing cardiovascular targets along
with Pfizer and Novartis, respectively, using the competitive RNaseH antisense gene knockdown technology.
Drugging
the undruggable
Part of the
attraction of RNAi for CVD for the pharmaceutical industry is because the targets that come from large
genetic studies (e.g. ApoCIII, Apo(a), ANGPTL3) based on chance alone are
not readily druggable. To make matters worse,
amorphous lipid macromolecular aggregates are particularly difficult to target with
either small molecules or antibodies.
Infrequent
dosing
What a
difference 10 years can make. When Protiva (now Arbutus) was one of the first to enter a systemically administered RNAi therapeutic
against LDLc-related ApoB into the clinic a decade ago, it often found itself
ridiculed for using RNAi in such an indication.
Systemic RNAi back then required relatively frequent (1-3 weeks) intravenous
administration which would make it an unlikely modality for widespread diseases
that ideally require decade-long preventive treatment strategies.
Fast-forward
to the present and now we have subcutaneously delivered RNAi with potential dosing
frequencies of up to once-a-year as evidenced by the lead candidate of this crop,
phase III asset Inclisiran by The Medicines Company. If the remarkable safety profile holds up
following about 2000 patient years of clinical experience, such a drug should
be very widely prescribed, not least because it should enjoy great
adherence, one of the major impediments of treatment success in cardiovascular
disease.
Undoubtedly,
it has been the Inclisiran performance so far that has attracted the attention
of players like Eli Lilly and Amgen, the latter of which, of course, should know
particularly well about the competitive threat from RNAi having an antibody-based PCSK9
agent on the market (Repatha). Beyond the upcoming
slew of phase III read-outs with Inclisiran, it will equally be interesting to see
the types of new targets being pursued and the clinical validation of targets like
Apo(a) by the antisense competition.
No comments:
Post a Comment