What caught my attention here is using RNA Editing for generating protective variants. Protective variants are genetic variants in the human population that make carriers less likely to develop a disease. PCSK9 and ApoCIII are well known in the cardiovascular field for those and have yielded promising therapeutics as a result. Protective variants can also be found in other areas such as infectious disease (e.g. CCR5 and HIV) and Alzheimer's.
Not least because the story surprised and intrigued me for its translational potential, I will illustrate protective variant generation using RNA Editing taking PCSK9 as an example.
Mimicking a PCSK9 mutation causing drop in bad
cholesterol
With Inclisiran, an RNAi trigger suppressing the expression of PCSK9, RNA Therapeutics have
become a commercial reality in cardiovascular disease aimed at very large populations. A key attraction of this agent is the
infrequent, semiannual dosing regimen that clamps down bad LDL cholesterol by
~-50%.
50%, however, somewhat lags the
efficacy of the competitive PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies (~-60%) which have to be
given at least monthly. The fact that more
robust LDL cholesterol lowering should therefore be possible also for RNA Therapeutics, the
race for the most effective PCSK9 in this class is yet to be decided.
Finding better RNA knockdown agents may be one, certainly attainable
strategy, although AstraZeneca has just given up on an RNaseH antisense oligo that had looked promising in that regard. Using an entirely new mechanism another.
Intriguingly, the sequencing of the PCSK9
gene in an individual with conspicuously low LDL cholesterol in Canadian Quebec province (Mayne et al. 2011) revealed
that a Q152H variant in the heterozygous (!) state could lower
circulating PCSK9 levels by ~-80% compared to the average, non-related
population. This translated to a 60-70% LDLc lowering. Subsequent cell culture
experiments confirmed the causality of this mutation in regulating
LDL-receptor levels via PCSK9 expression.
Curiously, while it was initially assumed that the mutation inhibited
autocatalytic cleavage of pro-PCSK9, these experiments suggested that such mutant
PCSK9s can also inhibit PCSK9 cleavage and subsequent export out of the cells in
trans. This dominant negative effect explains why the
mutation in the heterozygous state could have such an outsized effect on serum PCSK9 and LDLc levels.
While other protective PCSK9 variants
had been found before, this one was intriguing enough for ProQR to follow up on. As histidine (H) is unlikely to be unique in messing
up PCSK9 processing, ProQR chose QàR editing at
the 152 site, possibly because glutamines cannot be converted into histidine via
AàI editing, but also possibly because
they suspected that the more highly charged arginine (R) residue could be even
more impactful.
Impactful it was. Even at only modest 25% editing (which
certainly can, and has to be improved upon for further development), cleaved and secreted PCSK9 in cell
culture was reduced by roughly -90%.
It is important for the RNA Editing
space to continue to advertise what the technology can do. Because RNA Editing is not very useful as a genetic
tool for general, academic molecular biology, the onus is on the companies to
raise the awareness as some of the best translational ideas may come from scientists and physicians that have yet to hear about the technology.
Dirk, thank you for shedding so much light on an arcane subject. Could a "protective variant" change the course of a disease such as HIV in an already infected person?
ReplyDeleteWell, that would be CCR5 genome editing, right? 'Berlin patient'
ReplyDeleteHere's more on CCR5 genome editing and the "Berlin Patient." https://www.nature.com/articles/d42859-018-00019-3
ReplyDelete