Alpha-1-antitrypsin (AAT) is the lead program in the RNA Editing pipeline with Wave Life Sciences recently licensing its candidate to GSK. It is safe to assume that a number of other companies are working on similarly developing RNA Editing drugs in the AAT area as well. Developments in the competitive environment using other platforms such as gene knockdown (RNAi, ASO) and genome editing are therefore of high interest.
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals SEQUOIA data
This week, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals and partner Takeda revealed that its RNAi candidate for alpha-1-antitrypsin-related liver
disease worked as intended in the SEQUOIA phase II study and over time should
translate into a measurable benefit in terms of developing severe liver disease.
After 52 weeks of treatment, mutant Z-AAT was knocked
down by a solid -94%. This in turn led to a
2/3 decrease in the more inert aggregated form of alpha-1-antitrypsin. It is the aggregated AAT that is thought to
cause cellular stress, followed by a cycle of apoptosis and hepatocyte
regeneration, ultimately leading to inflammation and fibrosis, if not liver
failure in ~20% of subjects homozygous for the Z-allele of alpha-1-antitrypin.
Indeed, ARO-AAT/TAK-999 achieved a striking benefit of
reducing portal inflammation (see above graph) which should be highly predictive of a
benefit on liver fibrosis progression. Although a high 50% of trial subjects on ARO-AAT experienced a reduction in fibrosis, this was not
statistically significant due to small patient numbers. A larger and longer (2-4 years) registrational study is
therefore planned to confirm the benefit and gain regulatory approval.
RNAi unsurpassed in reducing Z-AAT, but RNA
Editing may be more elegant
If the degree of reducing the insulting Z-AAT was all
that mattered, RNAi would be difficult to beat. ADAR RNA Editing and genome editing
for example would have to overcome the limitation that target sequences are
limited to a very specific area around the mutation whereas RNAi has the entire mRNA to play with.
But looking more closely, the name of the game is actually inhibiting aggregation. It is now that I increasingly appreciate the elegance and power of the RNA Editing approach which fundamentally rests on the genetic observation that heterozygous carriers of alpha-1-antitrypsin disease have
a much reduced risk of developing related liver disease, if an increased risk at all. These people carry one 'Z' allele and one normal
‘M’ allele.
I had not paid much attention to this, thinking that
mechanistically this is simply due to a concentration effect of 50% less Z-AAT
polymerizing less well and having a protective genotype that manifests after
decades of life does not necessarily mean that converting a patient already
suffering from liver disease to such a genotype will necessarily translate to the
fastest possible treatment benefit. RNAi
with its highly potent Z-AAT reduction may be faster.
It is now that it dawns on me that there is likely
more to the MZ genotype benefit. Looking
at the Wave Life Sciences mouse preclinical data on its RNA Editing candidate,
it always irritated me that whereas the mRNA editing efficiency was ~50%, the
increase in circulating AAT was 7x.
Since only ~15% of Z-AAT normally gets out of the liver, this basically
means that the 50% of M-AAT allows essentially ALL of the AAT, including Z-AAT to get out
of the liver. This is consistent with
the ratio of M-AAT/Z-AAT in circulation reflecting the 50% mRNA editing
efficiency in hepatocytes.
It therefore appears that the M-AAT (and potentially non-wildtype variants generated by RNA Editing) functions to poison the Z-AAT aggregation chain reaction, keeps Z-AAT in solution and fit for secretion into circulation. What is more, unlike RNAi, this has the additional benefit of also addressing the lung manifestations due to insufficient levels of circulating AAT and for which alpha-1-antitrypsin disease is better known. RNAi by contrast may have to rely on other developments in improving the management of alpha-1 lung disease as it reduces circulating AAT even further.
In light of the above, as a shareholder I am now
changing my mind and support ProQR with its industry-leading IP and know-how to
enter the exciting alpha-1 race to generate a best-in-class RNA Editing drug. We should soon find out when ProQR will
reveal its line-up of initial pipeline candidates.
So true to form. Sigh.
ReplyDeleteDirk: do you any familiarity with Korro Bio?
ReplyDeleteKorro Bio...not much familiarity, no apparent history in oligonucleotide therapeutics, but based on the patent literature etc seems like 'No.3' in oligo-guided RNA Editing. I'm particularly curious about their capabilities in chemistry and delivery.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the color on Koro
ReplyDelete