It all looked like it would be the first commercial success story of small silencing RNAs when
Rosetta Genomics launched a series of microRNA tests in late 2008, among them mirView Mets for the identification of the tissue origin of Cancers of Unknown Primary (CUP). This PCR-based test took advantage of two critical properties of microRNAs for cancer
diagnostics: 1) stability (unlike messenger RNAs used e.g. in the comparable PCR-based
Oncotype Dx test by Genomic Health, microRNAs are relatively stable); 2) surprisingly informative on cancer biology.
[Correction May 17, 2012: While the first-generation miRview Mets test was qRT-PCR-based, the Medicare-covered second-generation miRview Mets2 involves the parallel detection of 64 microRNAs on a micro-array.]
Less than four years after the launch, however, the test (actually that of the improved version miRview Mets 2) was hardly
selling (less than $100k/quarter) and Rosetta Genomics, which only yesterday had a market cap of ~2M with important chunks of debt maturing next week and in early 2013, was fast approaching bankruptcy,
this time for real it seemed. Matters were made worse after falling out with former US distribution partner Prometheus Labs.
However, the CUP Dx
market should have been an attractive half-a-billion-dollar opportunity with approximately
150-200,000 cancer patients in the US alone that may benefit from such tests according
to Rosetta Genomics and its closest competitor, Pathway Diagnostics. By determining the tissue origin of
metastatic cancers and of primary tumors that are highly
dedifferentiated and where this is not possible by other means (such
as classical histological examination), the tests would aid in the diagnosis of
the cancers, thus informing treatment decisions. According to a recent cost-effectiveness study by Pathway Diagnostics, that company’s Affmetrix gene expression
array-based CUP test has real positive impacts, including improved quality-adjusted life expectancies enabled by better
treatment decisions based on the improved diagnoses (caveat: this study used historical
controls).
Just like Rosetta Genomics today, Pathway’s Tissue of Origin (TOO) received Medicarecoverage last summer. The reason why
Rosetta Genomics shares (ticker: ROSG) popped today by a cool 200% (!) is that coverage by major healthcare providers is critical for the adoption of
today’s molecular diagnostics as these often come at price tags on the order of $3500 a test
(e.g. the price of TOO according to a
presentation by Affymetrix).
The importance of Medicare coverage (other major insurance
companies usually follow Medicare’s lead) is also illustrated by the OncotypeDx test which can probably be considered the most successful of that type of
expression-based molecular diagnostics in the space: launched in early 2004, it
sold a mere $400,000 a quarter the year thereafter. When it, however, received Medicare coverage
in early 2006, sales exploded 10-fold. Today,
Genomic Health is selling around $200M worth of that test annually and sports a
market capitalization of a billion US dollars- >100x that of Rosetta Genomics despite today's pop.
Numbers for Pathway Dx are more difficult to come by as it is privately
held (it completed a $30M financing in 2010 though).
Today’s news is a huge step towards similar commercial success, at
least in the sense that it makes an immediate bankruptcy of Rosetta Genomics quite unlikely. The remaining
employees, however, have their work cut out for them: get a foot in the door with
oncologists, possibly by winning over KOLs and other activities such as
cost-effectiveness studies, gently growing the sales organization from the
currently only four oncology specialists to compete with Pathway and take a decent piece of the market.
For the sake of long-suffering shareholders, the company may
also consider avoiding excessive dilution partly by effectively shutting down the commercialization of their other microRNA diagnostics which by comparison look much
less attractive commercially. At the
same time, they should strive to monetize their relatively strong IP position in
microRNA Rx and Dx, foremost the recently issued European patent for the promising miR34a replacement cancer therapy to which microRNA Therapeutics company Mirna
Therapeutics would probably require access.
For more numbers on the miRviewMets2 test performance, clinical use along with immunohistochemistry, and competitive profile with regard to the mRNA-based Pathwork and bioTheranostic CUP tests, the Meiri et al. paper just published in The Oncologist is a must-read.
Update (May 17, 2012): Shortly after the close of the markets, Rosetta announced the issuance of $2.2M worth of stock (no options, it seems) at a 30% discount, increasing the share count by about 50% (about 2 million shares will be outstanding after the secondary). The pain from the dilution will be mitigated by the fact that this should take care of the $750k+interest payment due to their friends at Prometheus by May 22nd, thus allowing the company to stay in business. Also worth noting are the overhang stemming from ~200k shares that will likely be converted from existing debt at a share price of ~$1.4, representing another approx. 10% dilution at significant discount.
And finally, here's a youtube video giving you an introduction to Rosetta's scientists:
Disclaimer: This blog is not intended for distribution to or use by any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of, or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or which would subject the author or any of his collaborators and contributors to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. This blog expresses only my opinions, they may be flawed and are for entertainment purposes only. Opinions expressed are a direct result of information which may or may not be accurate, and I do not assume any responsibility for material errors or to provide updates should circumstances change. Opinions expressed in this blog may have been disseminated before to others. This blog should not be taken as investment, legal or tax advice. The investments referred to herein may not be suitable for you. Investments particularly in the field of RNAi Therapeutics and biotechnology carry a high risk of total loss. You, the reader must make your own investment decisions in consultation with your professional advisors in light of your specific circumstances. I reserve the right to buy, sell, or short any security including those that may or may not be discussed on my blog.