Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Functional Cure of Chronic Hepatitis B: RNAi Therapeutics May Be the Only Game in Town (Part I)


Today, I wanted to post the first of a two-part series on the hepatitis B virus (HBV) candidate by Arrowhead Research which is set to enter clinical development in the first half of this year.  But as if on cue, the company just announced the publication of extremely potent ('multi-log') reductions in gene expression with their systemic DPC delivery technology.  This thus bodes very well for what is shaping up to be an RNAi Therapeutics pipeline highlight: ARC520 for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B viral (HBV) infection. 

Are you wondering what could be the next HCV-type or maybe even larger drug development opportunity?  HBV may well be the new HCV.  With HCV increasingly curable, the pharmaceutical industry has increased appetite for finally also developing a cure for chronic HBV.  Based on the potent preclinical data with DPC delivery technology and the view of thought leaders in the field that the specific suppression of HBV proteins may be the single most promising mechanism by which this can be achieved,  I am more and more thrilled by the prospect that ARC520 could become a poster child for an RNAi Therapeutics that addresses a major public health burden.

In anticipation of the March webinar by Arrowhead where the company wants to talk more about the concept behind ARC520 and their most recent data on the drug candidate, two blog entries over the coming week will first explain the rationale for why HBV is such an attractive RNAi Therapeutics opportunity and then discuss the features that make ARC520 a particularly promising (including in a commercial sense) RNAi Therapeutics candidate.


Only RNAi Can Suppress HBV Proteins in a Specific, Potent, and Rapid Manner

About 2 billion worldwide are infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV).  300-400 million of these have subsequently developed chronic HBV, meaning that they are at increased risk of prematurely dying from liver-related complications such as cirrhosis and liver cancer.   Every year, more than one million chronic HBV patients die of such complications.  In East Asia and developing countries where mother-to-child transmission is the predominant (and highly effective from a viral point of view) mode of infection, HBV is responsible for more than half of primary liver cancers; in Western countries where transmission largely occurs via body fluids, esp. blood, it still accounts for about one quarter of cases.

This means that the public health burden of chronic HBV infection already surpasses that of HCV and is extending its lead as the new direct antiviral agents against HCV prove quite effective at eliminating HCV.  An important difference between HBV and HCV is that HBV is a DNA virus that will persist for life in hepatocytes.  This explains we can only dream of a ‘functional’ cure, not a cure full-stop.  HCV, by contrast, is an RNA virus which, in the absence of replication, will disappear due to the relative instability of RNA.  

Vaccination works almost 100% well to protect us from HBV infection. but its therapeutic application so far has failed and it also does not address mother-to-child transmission. Interferon and viral polymerase inhibitors (nucs) are currently only recommended for those with active chronic HBV as determined by increased liver enzyme levels in the presence of HBV.  These drugs, however, only work to convert 10-30% of those treated into the inactive carrier state with normalized liver enzymes and very little HBV DNA in the blood.  Nucs have the added benefit of very effectively inhibiting active viral replication, meaning that it does a good job at minimizing the ongoing inflammation in the liver.  Unfortunately, only very few of these patients can be considered to be cured and they are thus still at risk for viral re-emergence.

It is widely accepted that a functional cure for chronic HBV, meaning viral suppression in the absence of drug treatment, can only be achieved by harnessing adaptive immunity.  Here, the name of the game is achieving hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroconversion, meaning the development of antibodies to HBsAg.  People who stably carry such antibodies can be considered cured.  Although the exact mechanism by which this is supposed to occur is being debated, it is widely accepted that immune exhaustion due to the presence of abundant HBsAg in the serum in the form of subviral particles and in the liver is the cause of why our immune system tolerates HBV, instead of eradicating it.

While nucs, which inhibit viral polymerase, not mRNA transcription of viral mRNA which is performed by our own RNA polymerase II off the viral cccDNA, and interferon can have some suppressive effect on HBsAg levels (on the order of ½ log), it seems that RNAi Therapeutics is the only means to achieve the specific, potent, and rapid inhibition of HBsAg that is considered to be necessary for a successful relief from immune exhaustion. In doing so, an RNAi Therapeutics can do everything that a nuc can do and more.  This means that such an RNAi Therapeutic may also significantly expand the pool of chronic HBV patients on therapy and should become a core component in any combination therapy such as with an interferon.

Look out for the next post on why I think ARC520 is an excellent RNAi Therapeutics candidate to achieve the stated objective.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dirk,

After reading an article in Molecular Therapy, I am not impressed with DPC at all.

First, it seems DPC is an IV and not a SubQ.

Second, it is not as potent as it has been hyped. DPC has two components - NAG-MLP & chol-siRNA. It requires 2 mg/kg of chol-siF7 & 8 mg/kg of NAG-MLP to achieve 99% of knockdown for F7. That is a very high dose. LNP or GalNAc would be better than DPC.

Dirk Haussecker said...

Thanks for the comment. I am planning to read that paper asap. However, keep in mind that there are now subQ versions of DPCs that have been validated in monkeys (OTS 2012), meaning that the transition of ARC520 from i.v. to subQ is an obvious life-cycle, market-expanding opportunity(incl. extended patent life).

Bikerieder said...

Dirk

What do you think, is it possible that ARWR could get some funding for ARC-520 from the Heb B Foundation?

Anonymous said...

'HCV increasingly curable' Tell that to my father who needs a liver transplant you douchebag.

Anonymous said...

i jst read your article and am impressed,but i want to ask you a question. I got to know that i'm HBVpositive last weej. Since then i hv gone for several test which confirmed that my liver is stil in order. I want to know,does it mean that it's at acute stage? I also read that the virus is self limited. Pls advice me asap.

mike said...

I always wondered why though they needed 3 shots to protect you. I also wondered why we focus on immunization and not diet to prevent disease so much.

JOHNSON KATE said...

As a sign of gratitude for how my husband was saved from hepatitis b, i decided to reach out to those still suffering from this.
My husband was diagnosed of hepatitis b in 2013 and it was really tough and heartbreaking for me because he was my all and the symptoms were terrible, he always have Joint pain , and he always complain of Weakness of the body . we tried various therapies prescribed by our neurologist but none could cure him. I searched for a cure and i saw a testimony by someone who was cured and so many other with similar body problem, and he left the contact of the doctor who had the cure to hepatitis b. I never imagined hepatitis b has a natural cure not until i contacted him and he assured me my husband will be fine. I got the herbal medication he recommended and my husband used it and in one months he was fully okay even up till this moment he is so full of life. hepatitis b has a cure and it is a herbal cure contact the doctor for more info on drwilliams098675@gmail.com on how to get the medication. Thanks for reading my testimony.

By Dirk Haussecker. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: This blog is not intended for distribution to or use by any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of, or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or which would subject the author or any of his collaborators and contributors to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. This blog expresses only my opinions, they may be flawed and are for entertainment purposes only. Opinions expressed are a direct result of information which may or may not be accurate, and I do not assume any responsibility for material errors or to provide updates should circumstances change. Opinions expressed in this blog may have been disseminated before to others. This blog should not be taken as investment, legal or tax advice. The investments referred to herein may not be suitable for you. Investments particularly in the field of RNAi Therapeutics and biotechnology carry a high risk of total loss. You, the reader must make your own investment decisions in consultation with your professional advisors in light of your specific circumstances. I reserve the right to buy, sell, or short any security including those that may or may not be discussed on my blog.