Last
Friday, Dicerna and Alnylam announced that they had settled all ongoing
litigation between the parties just as the acrimonious fight was about to court.
Settlement terms
As part of
the settlement, Dicerna will pay Alnylam $25M in stock and cash and drop its anti-competitive
practices counter-suit against the RNAi behemoth. In addition, Dicerna has agreed to not pursue
certain targets/indications (see discussion below). In return, Alnylam will drop its trade secret
lawsuit it had filed on grounds of suspected GalNAc-conjugate trade secret
misappropriation in the wake of Alnylam’s acquisition of the Merck RNAi assets
in early 2014.
Litigation background
Allegedly,
ex-Merck employees who had been hired by Dicerna had taken along competitively advantageous information that Alnylam claimed that it paid for.
Personally,
given the timing and fuzziness of the litigation, I had always believed that Alnylam primarily filed the lawsuit to drain a much smaller, but direct competitor
of vital financial resources. In particular,
even if these ex-Merck employees took with them information important to
Alnylam, Merck obviously didn’t protect such knowledge as expected for trade
secrets. Moreover, Dicerna’s application
of GalNAc-RNAi conjugate looks extremely different from that of Alnylam. Even a more negative outcome should therefore not have adversely affected Dicerna's ability to further develop its technology.
Coming out from underneath the litigation cloak
Still, this
strategy had almost worked out. Ironically, it was Alnylam’s own success
in the clinic (à primarily
Patisiran phase III APOLLO data last fall, but also GalNAc-related data) that had provided
Dicerna stock with sufficient strength for the company to be in a position to ward
off the existential threat posed by the litigation: $25M just 15 months ago
would have been a mortal blow to ~$50M market cap minion Dicerna. Today, the $600M market cap makes the $25M almost
immaterial.
Nevertheless,
based on the extremely bullish market reaction to the deal (up close to 40% following announcement of the settlement before settling the day at +18%), I believe that an important facet of the deal has been widely underappreciated. Specifically, the fact that Dicerna had to agree not to pursue certain targets could
completely change the face of this company.
'Dicerna will be restricted in its development and other activities
relating to oligonucleotide-based therapeutics directed toward a defined set of
Alnylam targets, for periods ranging from 18 months up to four years.'
Instead of a
broad pure-play GalNAc RNAi company, Dicerna now probably needs to be considered a 5-or-so development candidate company for which the end game will be its sale to a larger company. Except for the
long-promised deal on the mystery candidate (AAT?), this reduces expectations for
future strategic blockbuster deals.
Disclosure: Especially in light of the target selection
restrictions, I view the settlement as incrementally negative for Dicerna and expect
the market to realize the same soon. Following Friday's strong move to the upside, Dicerna is a short-term conviction short with a $10 near-term price
target. Also expect Alnylam to sell the
2M million Dicerna shares almost as soon as it receives them (please read comments section below for correction). Long Alnylam.
2 comments:
Thank you for the note. Clearly lessens the value of the stock consideration, unless they were allowed to short last Friday ;).
You do know that the scientist that developed Galnac for ALNY originally worked for Ionis ....... JM must be thanking God for the IP agreements that he signed with Ionis some 10 years ago
Post a Comment