When it comes to new platform technologies, investors generally like to see their belief validated by large pharmaceutical companies. In addition to confirming the soundness of the scientific approach, in times when access to capital is constrained, such partnerships also provide an important financing source.
In RNA Editing, Venture
Capital certainly has taken the charge (and risk) by investing close to $600M
in Series As and Bs spread between Korro Bio, Shape Therapeutics, EdiGene and
ADARx (the last two are not pure-plays) largely in 2020-1. There have, however, been two notable Big
Pharma deals that materialized in the second half of 2021.
Shape Therapeutics-Roche
In August 2021, Shape Therapeutics
announced its first Big Pharma partnership.
Shape apparently has been working on the DNA-directed expression of editing RNAs
harnessing endogenous ADARs, especially in the CNS. Their favourite delivery vehicle is AAV viral
delivery.
It is an interesting
approach, since despite of going through the trouble of gene therapy-type
delivery, they choose not to bring exogenous ADARs along for the ride. This makes sense since overexpression of
ADARs is linked to widespread off-targeting and the molecular size of ADAR may be a vector capacity issue, too. As it
would have involved essentially naturally occurring ADARs (plus/minus a few optimizing mutations), the cost in terms of
immunogenicity though may have been tolerable. This is in stark contrast to genome editing
technologies like CRISPR where, because of delivery in the CNS, you would likely have to
deal with the extended expression of entirely foreign proteins.
Shape and Roche will tackle a number of neuronal diseases together, likely Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s
and more rare indications like Rett Syndrome. Of note, Roche has suffered a major setback in
oligonucleotide-based neurodegenerative drug development when efficacy and tox
issues derailed a late-stage Huntington’s disease drug candidate based on the intrathecal administration of phosphorothioate antisense molecules. So for them opting for AAV-based
expression of targeting RNAs is worth taking note of.
Rett Syndrome is a truly intriguing indication highlighting a few of the unique advantages of RNA Editing. Rett Syndrome affects ~1 in 10-15k female births. It is a severe, early onset neurodevelopmental disorder caused by too little MeCP2 expression due to mostly spontaneous (as opposed to inherited) mutations. Nevertheless, persons suffering from this X-linked gene condition can still live into their 40s and 50s- with severe disabilities. There are no drugs approved specifically addressing Rett Syndrome.
Rett Syndrome would seem like an ideal candidate for the development of gene therapy. What makes, however, gene therapy particularly challenging in this setting is that while too little of
the master epigenetic regulator that MeCP2 is gives you Rett Syndrome, too much
of it is neurotoxic. Add X chromosome inactivation mosaicism into the mix and the therapeutic window of MeCP2
expression narrows dramatically:
for each (neuronal) cell just enough to give you MeCP2
function, but not more, certainly not >2x normal MeCP2 expression.
As a technology that
does not change the rate of gene transcription, RNA Editing is ideally suited
for Rett Syndrome and it is estimated that 40-50% of cases can be addressed by
the technology. The downside is that in
order to address all of those mutations, similar to Duchenne’s and exon skipping, a
number of RNA editing molecules would have to be developed.
ProQR-Eli Lilly
A month following the
Shape deal, ProQR announced a partnership with Eli Lilly for up to 5 targets in
the liver and CNS. This was accompanied by a $20M upfront consideration and
a $30M equity investment.
Unlike Shape, ProQR
(pronounced ‘Procure’) is pursuing a more traditional approach to drug
development in the form of synthetic oligonucleotides for A-to-I editing. Eli Lilly has shown great commitment to RNA
Therapeutics for a while now with for example two RNAi compounds licensed from
Dicerna (now part of Novo Nordisk) in clinical development for two cardiometabolic
indications and a recent whopping $700M investment into a Genetic Medicine
research site for RNA- and DNA-based drug development. In the CNS, Eli Lilly will be interested in applying
the new platform to the usual suspects including Alzheimer’s and pain.
As RNA Editing is
moving into the clinic (Wave Life Sciences, alpha-1-antitrypsin) and more
people hear about the platform and come up with great ideas of where to apply it, but also as oligonucleotide
therapeutics more and more becomes part of the mainstream pharma mindset, I
expect additional Big Pharma deals to materialize soon.
2 comments:
Should help that ProQR's partner, Lilly, is a market darling at the moment. Lilly will be looking to push lots of things forward.
So ProQR has walked out of the failed drugs earlier 2022 and become welcomed by investors again ?
Post a Comment